YES We show the termination of the relative TRS R/S: R: f(g(x)) -> g(f(f(x))) f(h(x)) -> h(g(x)) |f'|(s(x),y,y) -> |f'|(y,x,s(x)) S: rand(x) -> x rand(x) -> rand(s(x)) -- SCC decomposition. Consider the non-minimal dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(g(x)) -> f#(f(x)) p2: f#(g(x)) -> f#(x) p3: |f'|#(s(x),y,y) -> |f'|#(y,x,s(x)) and R consists of: r1: f(g(x)) -> g(f(f(x))) r2: f(h(x)) -> h(g(x)) r3: |f'|(s(x),y,y) -> |f'|(y,x,s(x)) r4: rand(x) -> x r5: rand(x) -> rand(s(x)) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1, p2} {p3} -- Reduction pair. Consider the non-minimal dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(g(x)) -> f#(f(x)) p2: f#(g(x)) -> f#(x) and R consists of: r1: f(g(x)) -> g(f(f(x))) r2: f(h(x)) -> h(g(x)) r3: |f'|(s(x),y,y) -> |f'|(y,x,s(x)) r4: rand(x) -> x r5: rand(x) -> rand(s(x)) The set of usable rules consists of r1, r2, r3, r4, r5 Take the reduction pair: weighted path order base order: matrix interpretations: carrier: N^2 order: lexicographic order interpretations: f#_A(x1) = ((1,0),(1,0)) x1 + (1,0) g_A(x1) = ((1,0),(1,0)) x1 + (4,2) f_A(x1) = ((1,0),(1,0)) x1 + (0,3) h_A(x1) = (1,1) |f'|_A(x1,x2,x3) = ((1,0),(1,1)) x1 + ((1,0),(1,1)) x3 + (1,1) s_A(x1) = x1 rand_A(x1) = ((1,0),(1,1)) x1 + (1,1) precedence: f# = g = f = h = rand > |f'| > s partial status: pi(f#) = [] pi(g) = [] pi(f) = [] pi(h) = [] pi(|f'|) = [] pi(s) = [] pi(rand) = [] The next rules are strictly ordered: p2 We remove them from the problem. -- SCC decomposition. Consider the non-minimal dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(g(x)) -> f#(f(x)) and R consists of: r1: f(g(x)) -> g(f(f(x))) r2: f(h(x)) -> h(g(x)) r3: |f'|(s(x),y,y) -> |f'|(y,x,s(x)) r4: rand(x) -> x r5: rand(x) -> rand(s(x)) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1} -- Reduction pair. Consider the non-minimal dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(g(x)) -> f#(f(x)) and R consists of: r1: f(g(x)) -> g(f(f(x))) r2: f(h(x)) -> h(g(x)) r3: |f'|(s(x),y,y) -> |f'|(y,x,s(x)) r4: rand(x) -> x r5: rand(x) -> rand(s(x)) The set of usable rules consists of r1, r2, r3, r4, r5 Take the reduction pair: weighted path order base order: matrix interpretations: carrier: N^2 order: lexicographic order interpretations: f#_A(x1) = ((1,0),(0,0)) x1 + (1,1) g_A(x1) = ((1,0),(0,0)) x1 + (3,3) f_A(x1) = ((1,0),(1,0)) x1 + (0,2) h_A(x1) = (2,1) |f'|_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1 + x3 + (1,1) s_A(x1) = ((0,0),(1,0)) x1 rand_A(x1) = ((1,0),(1,1)) x1 + (1,1) precedence: g = f > |f'| = s = rand > f# = h partial status: pi(f#) = [] pi(g) = [] pi(f) = [] pi(h) = [] pi(|f'|) = [] pi(s) = [] pi(rand) = [] The next rules are strictly ordered: p1 We remove them from the problem. Then no dependency pair remains. -- Reduction pair. Consider the non-minimal dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: |f'|#(s(x),y,y) -> |f'|#(y,x,s(x)) and R consists of: r1: f(g(x)) -> g(f(f(x))) r2: f(h(x)) -> h(g(x)) r3: |f'|(s(x),y,y) -> |f'|(y,x,s(x)) r4: rand(x) -> x r5: rand(x) -> rand(s(x)) The set of usable rules consists of r1, r2, r3, r4, r5 Take the reduction pair: weighted path order base order: matrix interpretations: carrier: N^2 order: lexicographic order interpretations: |f'|#_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1 + x2 + (1,2) s_A(x1) = x1 + (0,1) f_A(x1) = (3,6) g_A(x1) = ((0,0),(1,0)) x1 + (1,2) h_A(x1) = (2,1) |f'|_A(x1,x2,x3) = ((1,0),(1,1)) x1 + ((0,0),(1,0)) x2 + x3 + (0,1) rand_A(x1) = ((1,0),(1,0)) x1 + (1,2) precedence: h = rand > f = g > |f'|# = s = |f'| partial status: pi(|f'|#) = [1, 2] pi(s) = [] pi(f) = [] pi(g) = [] pi(h) = [] pi(|f'|) = [] pi(rand) = [] The next rules are strictly ordered: p1 We remove them from the problem. Then no dependency pair remains.