YES

We show the termination of the relative TRS R/S:

  R:
  t(f(x),g(y),f(z)) -> t(z,g(x),g(y))
  t(g(x),g(y),f(z)) -> t(f(y),f(z),x)

  S:
  f(g(x)) -> g(f(x))
  g(f(x)) -> f(g(x))
  f(f(x)) -> g(g(x))
  g(g(x)) -> f(f(x))

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the non-minimal dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: t#(f(x),g(y),f(z)) -> t#(z,g(x),g(y))
p2: t#(g(x),g(y),f(z)) -> t#(f(y),f(z),x)

and R consists of:

r1: t(f(x),g(y),f(z)) -> t(z,g(x),g(y))
r2: t(g(x),g(y),f(z)) -> t(f(y),f(z),x)
r3: f(g(x)) -> g(f(x))
r4: g(f(x)) -> f(g(x))
r5: f(f(x)) -> g(g(x))
r6: g(g(x)) -> f(f(x))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the non-minimal dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: t#(f(x),g(y),f(z)) -> t#(z,g(x),g(y))
p2: t#(g(x),g(y),f(z)) -> t#(f(y),f(z),x)

and R consists of:

r1: t(f(x),g(y),f(z)) -> t(z,g(x),g(y))
r2: t(g(x),g(y),f(z)) -> t(f(y),f(z),x)
r3: f(g(x)) -> g(f(x))
r4: g(f(x)) -> f(g(x))
r5: f(f(x)) -> g(g(x))
r6: g(g(x)) -> f(f(x))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      matrix interpretations:
      
        carrier: N^2
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          t#_A(x1,x2,x3) = ((1,0),(1,1)) x1 + ((1,0),(1,1)) x2 + ((1,0),(1,1)) x3 + (1,0)
          f_A(x1) = ((1,1),(1,0)) x1 + (1,1)
          g_A(x1) = ((1,1),(1,0)) x1 + (1,1)
          t_A(x1,x2,x3) = ((1,0),(0,0)) x1 + ((1,0),(0,0)) x2 + ((1,0),(0,0)) x3 + (1,2)
  
    precedence:
    
      t# = f = g = t
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(t#) = [1]
      pi(f) = []
      pi(g) = []
      pi(t) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the non-minimal dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: t#(g(x),g(y),f(z)) -> t#(f(y),f(z),x)

and R consists of:

r1: t(f(x),g(y),f(z)) -> t(z,g(x),g(y))
r2: t(g(x),g(y),f(z)) -> t(f(y),f(z),x)
r3: f(g(x)) -> g(f(x))
r4: g(f(x)) -> f(g(x))
r5: f(f(x)) -> g(g(x))
r6: g(g(x)) -> f(f(x))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the non-minimal dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: t#(g(x),g(y),f(z)) -> t#(f(y),f(z),x)

and R consists of:

r1: t(f(x),g(y),f(z)) -> t(z,g(x),g(y))
r2: t(g(x),g(y),f(z)) -> t(f(y),f(z),x)
r3: f(g(x)) -> g(f(x))
r4: g(f(x)) -> f(g(x))
r5: f(f(x)) -> g(g(x))
r6: g(g(x)) -> f(f(x))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      matrix interpretations:
      
        carrier: N^2
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          t#_A(x1,x2,x3) = ((1,1),(0,0)) x1 + ((1,1),(0,0)) x2 + ((1,1),(0,0)) x3 + (1,3)
          g_A(x1) = x1 + (1,1)
          f_A(x1) = ((0,1),(1,0)) x1 + (0,2)
          t_A(x1,x2,x3) = (1,1)
  
    precedence:
    
      t > t# = g = f
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(t#) = []
      pi(g) = []
      pi(f) = []
      pi(t) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.