YES We show the termination of the TRS R: half(|0|()) -> |0|() half(s(|0|())) -> |0|() half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x)) lastbit(|0|()) -> |0|() lastbit(s(|0|())) -> s(|0|()) lastbit(s(s(x))) -> lastbit(x) zero(|0|()) -> true() zero(s(x)) -> false() conv(x) -> conviter(x,cons(|0|(),nil())) conviter(x,l) -> if(zero(x),x,l) if(true(),x,l) -> l if(false(),x,l) -> conviter(half(x),cons(lastbit(x),l)) -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: half#(s(s(x))) -> half#(x) p2: lastbit#(s(s(x))) -> lastbit#(x) p3: conv#(x) -> conviter#(x,cons(|0|(),nil())) p4: conviter#(x,l) -> if#(zero(x),x,l) p5: conviter#(x,l) -> zero#(x) p6: if#(false(),x,l) -> conviter#(half(x),cons(lastbit(x),l)) p7: if#(false(),x,l) -> half#(x) p8: if#(false(),x,l) -> lastbit#(x) and R consists of: r1: half(|0|()) -> |0|() r2: half(s(|0|())) -> |0|() r3: half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x)) r4: lastbit(|0|()) -> |0|() r5: lastbit(s(|0|())) -> s(|0|()) r6: lastbit(s(s(x))) -> lastbit(x) r7: zero(|0|()) -> true() r8: zero(s(x)) -> false() r9: conv(x) -> conviter(x,cons(|0|(),nil())) r10: conviter(x,l) -> if(zero(x),x,l) r11: if(true(),x,l) -> l r12: if(false(),x,l) -> conviter(half(x),cons(lastbit(x),l)) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p4, p6} {p1} {p2} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: conviter#(x,l) -> if#(zero(x),x,l) p2: if#(false(),x,l) -> conviter#(half(x),cons(lastbit(x),l)) and R consists of: r1: half(|0|()) -> |0|() r2: half(s(|0|())) -> |0|() r3: half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x)) r4: lastbit(|0|()) -> |0|() r5: lastbit(s(|0|())) -> s(|0|()) r6: lastbit(s(s(x))) -> lastbit(x) r7: zero(|0|()) -> true() r8: zero(s(x)) -> false() r9: conv(x) -> conviter(x,cons(|0|(),nil())) r10: conviter(x,l) -> if(zero(x),x,l) r11: if(true(),x,l) -> l r12: if(false(),x,l) -> conviter(half(x),cons(lastbit(x),l)) The set of usable rules consists of r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, r8 Take the reduction pair: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: conviter#_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 4, x2 + 2} if#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{x1 - 1, x2 + 3, x3 + 1} zero_A(x1) = x1 + 3 false_A = 7 half_A(x1) = max{1, x1 - 2} cons_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 2, x2 - 2} lastbit_A(x1) = x1 + 2 |0|_A = 1 s_A(x1) = x1 + 4 true_A = 1 The next rules are strictly ordered: p1, p2 We remove them from the problem. Then no dependency pair remains. -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: half#(s(s(x))) -> half#(x) and R consists of: r1: half(|0|()) -> |0|() r2: half(s(|0|())) -> |0|() r3: half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x)) r4: lastbit(|0|()) -> |0|() r5: lastbit(s(|0|())) -> s(|0|()) r6: lastbit(s(s(x))) -> lastbit(x) r7: zero(|0|()) -> true() r8: zero(s(x)) -> false() r9: conv(x) -> conviter(x,cons(|0|(),nil())) r10: conviter(x,l) -> if(zero(x),x,l) r11: if(true(),x,l) -> l r12: if(false(),x,l) -> conviter(half(x),cons(lastbit(x),l)) The set of usable rules consists of (no rules) Take the monotone reduction pair: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: half#_A(x1) = x1 s_A(x1) = x1 + 1 The next rules are strictly ordered: p1 We remove them from the problem. Then no dependency pair remains. -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: lastbit#(s(s(x))) -> lastbit#(x) and R consists of: r1: half(|0|()) -> |0|() r2: half(s(|0|())) -> |0|() r3: half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x)) r4: lastbit(|0|()) -> |0|() r5: lastbit(s(|0|())) -> s(|0|()) r6: lastbit(s(s(x))) -> lastbit(x) r7: zero(|0|()) -> true() r8: zero(s(x)) -> false() r9: conv(x) -> conviter(x,cons(|0|(),nil())) r10: conviter(x,l) -> if(zero(x),x,l) r11: if(true(),x,l) -> l r12: if(false(),x,l) -> conviter(half(x),cons(lastbit(x),l)) The set of usable rules consists of (no rules) Take the monotone reduction pair: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: lastbit#_A(x1) = x1 s_A(x1) = x1 + 1 The next rules are strictly ordered: p1 We remove them from the problem. Then no dependency pair remains.