YES We show the termination of the TRS R: f(f(x,a()),a()) -> f(f(f(a(),a()),f(x,a())),a()) -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(f(x,a()),a()) -> f#(f(f(a(),a()),f(x,a())),a()) p2: f#(f(x,a()),a()) -> f#(f(a(),a()),f(x,a())) p3: f#(f(x,a()),a()) -> f#(a(),a()) and R consists of: r1: f(f(x,a()),a()) -> f(f(f(a(),a()),f(x,a())),a()) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1, p2} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(f(x,a()),a()) -> f#(f(f(a(),a()),f(x,a())),a()) p2: f#(f(x,a()),a()) -> f#(f(a(),a()),f(x,a())) and R consists of: r1: f(f(x,a()),a()) -> f(f(f(a(),a()),f(x,a())),a()) The set of usable rules consists of r1 Take the reduction pair: lexicographic combination of reduction pairs: 1. max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: f#_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 17, x2 + 11} f_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x2 - 12} a_A = 8 2. max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: f#_A(x1,x2) = 0 f_A(x1,x2) = 0 a_A = 0 The next rules are strictly ordered: p2 We remove them from the problem. -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(f(x,a()),a()) -> f#(f(f(a(),a()),f(x,a())),a()) and R consists of: r1: f(f(x,a()),a()) -> f(f(f(a(),a()),f(x,a())),a()) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(f(x,a()),a()) -> f#(f(f(a(),a()),f(x,a())),a()) and R consists of: r1: f(f(x,a()),a()) -> f(f(f(a(),a()),f(x,a())),a()) The set of usable rules consists of r1 Take the reduction pair: lexicographic combination of reduction pairs: 1. max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: f#_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 13, x2} f_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x1 - 5, x2 - 9} a_A = 12 2. max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: f#_A(x1,x2) = 0 f_A(x1,x2) = 0 a_A = 0 The next rules are strictly ordered: p1 We remove them from the problem. Then no dependency pair remains.