YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  le(|0|(),y) -> true()
  le(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
  le(s(x),s(y)) -> le(x,y)
  minus(x,|0|()) -> x
  minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
  mod(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
  mod(s(x),|0|()) -> |0|()
  mod(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))
  if_mod(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod(minus(x,y),s(y))
  if_mod(false(),s(x),s(y)) -> s(x)

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: le#(s(x),s(y)) -> le#(x,y)
p2: minus#(s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(x,y)
p3: mod#(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod#(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))
p4: mod#(s(x),s(y)) -> le#(y,x)
p5: if_mod#(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod#(minus(x,y),s(y))
p6: if_mod#(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: le(|0|(),y) -> true()
r2: le(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r3: le(s(x),s(y)) -> le(x,y)
r4: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r5: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r6: mod(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r7: mod(s(x),|0|()) -> |0|()
r8: mod(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))
r9: if_mod(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod(minus(x,y),s(y))
r10: if_mod(false(),s(x),s(y)) -> s(x)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p3, p5}
  {p1}
  {p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: if_mod#(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod#(minus(x,y),s(y))
p2: mod#(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod#(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))

and R consists of:

r1: le(|0|(),y) -> true()
r2: le(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r3: le(s(x),s(y)) -> le(x,y)
r4: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r5: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r6: mod(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r7: mod(s(x),|0|()) -> |0|()
r8: mod(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))
r9: if_mod(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod(minus(x,y),s(y))
r10: if_mod(false(),s(x),s(y)) -> s(x)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3, r4, r5

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      matrix interpretations:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: lexicographic order
        interpretations:
          if_mod#_A(x1,x2,x3) = x2 + x3 + 1
          true_A() = 2
          s_A(x1) = x1 + 5
          mod#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 2
          minus_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 3
          le_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 6
          |0|_A() = 1
          false_A() = 6
  
    precedence:
    
      if_mod# = true = s = mod# = minus = le = |0| = false
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(if_mod#) = []
      pi(true) = []
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(mod#) = [2]
      pi(minus) = [1]
      pi(le) = [1]
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(false) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: mod#(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod#(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))

and R consists of:

r1: le(|0|(),y) -> true()
r2: le(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r3: le(s(x),s(y)) -> le(x,y)
r4: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r5: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r6: mod(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r7: mod(s(x),|0|()) -> |0|()
r8: mod(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))
r9: if_mod(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod(minus(x,y),s(y))
r10: if_mod(false(),s(x),s(y)) -> s(x)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  (no SCCs)

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: le#(s(x),s(y)) -> le#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: le(|0|(),y) -> true()
r2: le(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r3: le(s(x),s(y)) -> le(x,y)
r4: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r5: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r6: mod(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r7: mod(s(x),|0|()) -> |0|()
r8: mod(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))
r9: if_mod(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod(minus(x,y),s(y))
r10: if_mod(false(),s(x),s(y)) -> s(x)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      matrix interpretations:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: lexicographic order
        interpretations:
          le#_A(x1,x2) = x2
          s_A(x1) = x1 + 1
  
    precedence:
    
      le# = s
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(le#) = [2]
      pi(s) = [1]

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: minus#(s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: le(|0|(),y) -> true()
r2: le(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r3: le(s(x),s(y)) -> le(x,y)
r4: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r5: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r6: mod(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r7: mod(s(x),|0|()) -> |0|()
r8: mod(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))
r9: if_mod(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod(minus(x,y),s(y))
r10: if_mod(false(),s(x),s(y)) -> s(x)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      matrix interpretations:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: lexicographic order
        interpretations:
          minus#_A(x1,x2) = x2
          s_A(x1) = x1 + 1
  
    precedence:
    
      minus# = s
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(minus#) = [2]
      pi(s) = [1]

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.