YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
  div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
  quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
  quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
  quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot#(x,y,z)
p3: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r2: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r5: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2, p3}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))
p3: quot#(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot#(x,y,z)

and R consists of:

r1: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r2: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r5: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      matrix interpretations:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: lexicographic order
        interpretations:
          div#_A(x1,x2) = x1
          quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1
          |0|_A() = 2
          s_A(x1) = x1 + 1
  
    precedence:
    
      div# = quot# = |0| = s
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(div#) = [1]
      pi(quot#) = [1]
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(s) = [1]

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p3

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r2: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r5: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r2: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r5: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      matrix interpretations:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: lexicographic order
        interpretations:
          div#_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 2
          quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = x2 + 1
          |0|_A() = 4
          s_A(x1) = 1
  
    precedence:
    
      |0| > div# > quot# = s
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(div#) = []
      pi(quot#) = [2]
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(s) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p2

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)

and R consists of:

r1: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r2: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r5: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  (no SCCs)