YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  app(id(),x) -> x
  app(add(),|0|()) -> id()
  app(app(add(),app(s(),x)),y) -> app(s(),app(app(add(),x),y))
  app(app(map(),f),nil()) -> nil()
  app(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app(app(cons(),app(f,x)),app(app(map(),f),xs))

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: app#(app(add(),app(s(),x)),y) -> app#(s(),app(app(add(),x),y))
p2: app#(app(add(),app(s(),x)),y) -> app#(app(add(),x),y)
p3: app#(app(add(),app(s(),x)),y) -> app#(add(),x)
p4: app#(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app#(app(cons(),app(f,x)),app(app(map(),f),xs))
p5: app#(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app#(cons(),app(f,x))
p6: app#(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app#(f,x)
p7: app#(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app#(app(map(),f),xs)

and R consists of:

r1: app(id(),x) -> x
r2: app(add(),|0|()) -> id()
r3: app(app(add(),app(s(),x)),y) -> app(s(),app(app(add(),x),y))
r4: app(app(map(),f),nil()) -> nil()
r5: app(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app(app(cons(),app(f,x)),app(app(map(),f),xs))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p2, p6, p7}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: app#(app(add(),app(s(),x)),y) -> app#(app(add(),x),y)
p2: app#(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app#(app(map(),f),xs)
p3: app#(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app#(f,x)

and R consists of:

r1: app(id(),x) -> x
r2: app(add(),|0|()) -> id()
r3: app(app(add(),app(s(),x)),y) -> app(s(),app(app(add(),x),y))
r4: app(app(map(),f),nil()) -> nil()
r5: app(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app(app(cons(),app(f,x)),app(app(map(),f),xs))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r2

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      matrix interpretations:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: lexicographic order
        interpretations:
          app#_A(x1,x2) = x1
          app_A(x1,x2) = x2
          add_A() = 2
          s_A() = 1
          map_A() = 0
          cons_A() = 1
          |0|_A() = 1
          id_A() = 0
  
    precedence:
    
      id > app# = app = add = s = map = cons = |0|
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(app#) = [1]
      pi(app) = [2]
      pi(add) = []
      pi(s) = []
      pi(map) = []
      pi(cons) = []
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(id) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p3

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: app#(app(add(),app(s(),x)),y) -> app#(app(add(),x),y)
p2: app#(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app#(app(map(),f),xs)

and R consists of:

r1: app(id(),x) -> x
r2: app(add(),|0|()) -> id()
r3: app(app(add(),app(s(),x)),y) -> app(s(),app(app(add(),x),y))
r4: app(app(map(),f),nil()) -> nil()
r5: app(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app(app(cons(),app(f,x)),app(app(map(),f),xs))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1}
  {p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: app#(app(add(),app(s(),x)),y) -> app#(app(add(),x),y)

and R consists of:

r1: app(id(),x) -> x
r2: app(add(),|0|()) -> id()
r3: app(app(add(),app(s(),x)),y) -> app(s(),app(app(add(),x),y))
r4: app(app(map(),f),nil()) -> nil()
r5: app(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app(app(cons(),app(f,x)),app(app(map(),f),xs))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r2

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      matrix interpretations:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: lexicographic order
        interpretations:
          app#_A(x1,x2) = x1
          app_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 2
          add_A() = 5
          s_A() = 1
          |0|_A() = 1
          id_A() = 0
  
    precedence:
    
      app = add = s = |0| = id > app#
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(app#) = []
      pi(app) = [2]
      pi(add) = []
      pi(s) = []
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(id) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: app#(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app#(app(map(),f),xs)

and R consists of:

r1: app(id(),x) -> x
r2: app(add(),|0|()) -> id()
r3: app(app(add(),app(s(),x)),y) -> app(s(),app(app(add(),x),y))
r4: app(app(map(),f),nil()) -> nil()
r5: app(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app(app(cons(),app(f,x)),app(app(map(),f),xs))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      matrix interpretations:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: lexicographic order
        interpretations:
          app#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 3
          app_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 2
          map_A() = 4
          cons_A() = 1
  
    precedence:
    
      app# = app = map = cons
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(app#) = [1, 2]
      pi(app) = [2]
      pi(map) = []
      pi(cons) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.