YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  *(x,*(y,z)) -> *(otimes(x,y),z)
  *(|1|(),y) -> y
  *(+(x,y),z) -> oplus(*(x,z),*(y,z))
  *(x,oplus(y,z)) -> oplus(*(x,y),*(x,z))

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: *#(x,*(y,z)) -> *#(otimes(x,y),z)
p2: *#(+(x,y),z) -> *#(x,z)
p3: *#(+(x,y),z) -> *#(y,z)
p4: *#(x,oplus(y,z)) -> *#(x,y)
p5: *#(x,oplus(y,z)) -> *#(x,z)

and R consists of:

r1: *(x,*(y,z)) -> *(otimes(x,y),z)
r2: *(|1|(),y) -> y
r3: *(+(x,y),z) -> oplus(*(x,z),*(y,z))
r4: *(x,oplus(y,z)) -> oplus(*(x,y),*(x,z))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2, p3, p4, p5}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: *#(x,*(y,z)) -> *#(otimes(x,y),z)
p2: *#(x,oplus(y,z)) -> *#(x,z)
p3: *#(x,oplus(y,z)) -> *#(x,y)
p4: *#(+(x,y),z) -> *#(y,z)
p5: *#(+(x,y),z) -> *#(x,z)

and R consists of:

r1: *(x,*(y,z)) -> *(otimes(x,y),z)
r2: *(|1|(),y) -> y
r3: *(+(x,y),z) -> oplus(*(x,z),*(y,z))
r4: *(x,oplus(y,z)) -> oplus(*(x,y),*(x,z))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      matrix interpretations:
      
        carrier: N^2
        order: lexicographic order
        interpretations:
          *#_A(x1,x2) = x2
          *_A(x1,x2) = x2 + (2,1)
          otimes_A(x1,x2) = (1,2)
          oplus_A(x1,x2) = ((1,0),(1,1)) x1 + x2 + (1,1)
          +_A(x1,x2) = (1,1)
  
    precedence:
    
      otimes > oplus > *# > * = +
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(*#) = [2]
      pi(*) = [2]
      pi(otimes) = []
      pi(oplus) = [1, 2]
      pi(+) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p2

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: *#(x,*(y,z)) -> *#(otimes(x,y),z)
p2: *#(x,oplus(y,z)) -> *#(x,y)
p3: *#(+(x,y),z) -> *#(y,z)
p4: *#(+(x,y),z) -> *#(x,z)

and R consists of:

r1: *(x,*(y,z)) -> *(otimes(x,y),z)
r2: *(|1|(),y) -> y
r3: *(+(x,y),z) -> oplus(*(x,z),*(y,z))
r4: *(x,oplus(y,z)) -> oplus(*(x,y),*(x,z))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2, p3, p4}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: *#(x,*(y,z)) -> *#(otimes(x,y),z)
p2: *#(x,oplus(y,z)) -> *#(x,y)
p3: *#(+(x,y),z) -> *#(x,z)
p4: *#(+(x,y),z) -> *#(y,z)

and R consists of:

r1: *(x,*(y,z)) -> *(otimes(x,y),z)
r2: *(|1|(),y) -> y
r3: *(+(x,y),z) -> oplus(*(x,z),*(y,z))
r4: *(x,oplus(y,z)) -> oplus(*(x,y),*(x,z))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      matrix interpretations:
      
        carrier: N^2
        order: lexicographic order
        interpretations:
          *#_A(x1,x2) = ((1,0),(1,0)) x2 + (2,2)
          *_A(x1,x2) = ((1,0),(1,1)) x1 + x2 + (3,3)
          otimes_A(x1,x2) = (1,1)
          oplus_A(x1,x2) = ((1,0),(0,0)) x1 + (1,1)
          +_A(x1,x2) = ((0,0),(1,0)) x1 + (1,1)
  
    precedence:
    
      * = otimes = oplus > *# = +
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(*#) = []
      pi(*) = [2]
      pi(otimes) = []
      pi(oplus) = []
      pi(+) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p2

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: *#(x,*(y,z)) -> *#(otimes(x,y),z)
p2: *#(+(x,y),z) -> *#(x,z)
p3: *#(+(x,y),z) -> *#(y,z)

and R consists of:

r1: *(x,*(y,z)) -> *(otimes(x,y),z)
r2: *(|1|(),y) -> y
r3: *(+(x,y),z) -> oplus(*(x,z),*(y,z))
r4: *(x,oplus(y,z)) -> oplus(*(x,y),*(x,z))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p2, p3}
  {p1}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: *#(+(x,y),z) -> *#(y,z)
p2: *#(+(x,y),z) -> *#(x,z)

and R consists of:

r1: *(x,*(y,z)) -> *(otimes(x,y),z)
r2: *(|1|(),y) -> y
r3: *(+(x,y),z) -> oplus(*(x,z),*(y,z))
r4: *(x,oplus(y,z)) -> oplus(*(x,y),*(x,z))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      matrix interpretations:
      
        carrier: N^2
        order: lexicographic order
        interpretations:
          *#_A(x1,x2) = ((1,0),(1,1)) x1 + (1,1)
          +_A(x1,x2) = ((1,0),(1,1)) x1 + ((1,0),(1,1)) x2 + (2,2)
  
    precedence:
    
      + > *#
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(*#) = []
      pi(+) = [2]

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p2

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: *#(+(x,y),z) -> *#(y,z)

and R consists of:

r1: *(x,*(y,z)) -> *(otimes(x,y),z)
r2: *(|1|(),y) -> y
r3: *(+(x,y),z) -> oplus(*(x,z),*(y,z))
r4: *(x,oplus(y,z)) -> oplus(*(x,y),*(x,z))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: *#(+(x,y),z) -> *#(y,z)

and R consists of:

r1: *(x,*(y,z)) -> *(otimes(x,y),z)
r2: *(|1|(),y) -> y
r3: *(+(x,y),z) -> oplus(*(x,z),*(y,z))
r4: *(x,oplus(y,z)) -> oplus(*(x,y),*(x,z))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      matrix interpretations:
      
        carrier: N^2
        order: lexicographic order
        interpretations:
          *#_A(x1,x2) = ((1,0),(0,0)) x1 + (1,1)
          +_A(x1,x2) = ((1,0),(1,1)) x1 + ((1,0),(0,0)) x2 + (2,2)
  
    precedence:
    
      *# = +
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(*#) = []
      pi(+) = [1]

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: *#(x,*(y,z)) -> *#(otimes(x,y),z)

and R consists of:

r1: *(x,*(y,z)) -> *(otimes(x,y),z)
r2: *(|1|(),y) -> y
r3: *(+(x,y),z) -> oplus(*(x,z),*(y,z))
r4: *(x,oplus(y,z)) -> oplus(*(x,y),*(x,z))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      matrix interpretations:
      
        carrier: N^2
        order: lexicographic order
        interpretations:
          *#_A(x1,x2) = x2 + (1,1)
          *_A(x1,x2) = x2 + (2,2)
          otimes_A(x1,x2) = (1,1)
  
    precedence:
    
      *# = * = otimes
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(*#) = [2]
      pi(*) = []
      pi(otimes) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.