YES We show the termination of the TRS R: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|() div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y) quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|() quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z) quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z))) -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y) p2: quot#(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot#(x,y,z) p3: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z)) and R consists of: r1: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|() r2: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y) r3: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|() r4: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z) r5: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z))) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1, p2, p3} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y) p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z)) p3: quot#(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot#(x,y,z) and R consists of: r1: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|() r2: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y) r3: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|() r4: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z) r5: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z))) The set of usable rules consists of (no rules) Take the reduction pair: lexicographic combination of reduction pairs: 1. weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: div#_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 5, x2 + 2} quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{x1 + 5, x3 + 2} |0|_A = 2 s_A(x1) = x1 + 2 precedence: div# = quot# > |0| = s partial status: pi(div#) = [1] pi(quot#) = [1] pi(|0|) = [] pi(s) = [] 2. weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: div#_A(x1,x2) = 1 quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = 1 |0|_A = 0 s_A(x1) = 4 precedence: s > div# = quot# = |0| partial status: pi(div#) = [] pi(quot#) = [] pi(|0|) = [] pi(s) = [] The next rules are strictly ordered: p3 We remove them from the problem. -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y) p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z)) and R consists of: r1: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|() r2: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y) r3: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|() r4: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z) r5: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z))) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1, p2} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y) p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z)) and R consists of: r1: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|() r2: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y) r3: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|() r4: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z) r5: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z))) The set of usable rules consists of (no rules) Take the reduction pair: lexicographic combination of reduction pairs: 1. weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: div#_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 4 quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{x2 - 1, x3 + 1} |0|_A = 6 s_A(x1) = 0 precedence: div# = quot# > |0| > s partial status: pi(div#) = [] pi(quot#) = [3] pi(|0|) = [] pi(s) = [] 2. weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: div#_A(x1,x2) = 0 quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = 1 |0|_A = 0 s_A(x1) = 0 precedence: quot# > div# = |0| > s partial status: pi(div#) = [] pi(quot#) = [] pi(|0|) = [] pi(s) = [] The next rules are strictly ordered: p1 We remove them from the problem. -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z)) and R consists of: r1: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|() r2: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y) r3: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|() r4: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z) r5: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z))) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: (no SCCs)