YES We show the termination of the TRS R: f(c(s(x),y)) -> f(c(x,s(y))) g(c(x,s(y))) -> g(c(s(x),y)) g(s(f(x))) -> g(f(x)) -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(c(s(x),y)) -> f#(c(x,s(y))) p2: g#(c(x,s(y))) -> g#(c(s(x),y)) p3: g#(s(f(x))) -> g#(f(x)) and R consists of: r1: f(c(s(x),y)) -> f(c(x,s(y))) r2: g(c(x,s(y))) -> g(c(s(x),y)) r3: g(s(f(x))) -> g(f(x)) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1} {p3} {p2} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(c(s(x),y)) -> f#(c(x,s(y))) and R consists of: r1: f(c(s(x),y)) -> f(c(x,s(y))) r2: g(c(x,s(y))) -> g(c(s(x),y)) r3: g(s(f(x))) -> g(f(x)) The set of usable rules consists of (no rules) Take the reduction pair: lexicographic combination of reduction pairs: 1. weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: f#_A(x1) = x1 + 5 c_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 2} s_A(x1) = x1 + 3 precedence: f# = c = s partial status: pi(f#) = [] pi(c) = [] pi(s) = [] 2. weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: f#_A(x1) = x1 + 3 c_A(x1,x2) = 0 s_A(x1) = max{6, x1 + 3} precedence: f# = c = s partial status: pi(f#) = [] pi(c) = [] pi(s) = [1] The next rules are strictly ordered: p1 We remove them from the problem. Then no dependency pair remains. -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: g#(s(f(x))) -> g#(f(x)) and R consists of: r1: f(c(s(x),y)) -> f(c(x,s(y))) r2: g(c(x,s(y))) -> g(c(s(x),y)) r3: g(s(f(x))) -> g(f(x)) The set of usable rules consists of r1 Take the reduction pair: lexicographic combination of reduction pairs: 1. weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: g#_A(x1) = max{13, x1 + 11} s_A(x1) = max{3, x1} f_A(x1) = max{12, x1 + 11} c_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 8, x2 + 4} precedence: g# = s = f = c partial status: pi(g#) = [1] pi(s) = [1] pi(f) = [1] pi(c) = [1, 2] 2. weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: g#_A(x1) = max{12, x1 + 10} s_A(x1) = x1 + 5 f_A(x1) = x1 + 6 c_A(x1,x2) = max{x1, x2 + 4} precedence: g# = s = f = c partial status: pi(g#) = [] pi(s) = [1] pi(f) = [] pi(c) = [1, 2] The next rules are strictly ordered: p1 We remove them from the problem. Then no dependency pair remains. -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: g#(c(x,s(y))) -> g#(c(s(x),y)) and R consists of: r1: f(c(s(x),y)) -> f(c(x,s(y))) r2: g(c(x,s(y))) -> g(c(s(x),y)) r3: g(s(f(x))) -> g(f(x)) The set of usable rules consists of (no rules) Take the reduction pair: lexicographic combination of reduction pairs: 1. weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: g#_A(x1) = max{5, x1 + 1} c_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x2 - 2} s_A(x1) = max{9, x1 + 8} precedence: c > g# = s partial status: pi(g#) = [1] pi(c) = [] pi(s) = [1] 2. weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: g#_A(x1) = x1 + 3 c_A(x1,x2) = 0 s_A(x1) = max{6, x1 + 3} precedence: g# = c = s partial status: pi(g#) = [] pi(c) = [] pi(s) = [1] The next rules are strictly ordered: p1 We remove them from the problem. Then no dependency pair remains.