YES We show the termination of the TRS R: and(x,false()) -> false() and(x,not(false())) -> x not(not(x)) -> x implies(false(),y) -> not(false()) implies(x,false()) -> not(x) implies(not(x),not(y)) -> implies(y,and(x,y)) -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: implies#(false(),y) -> not#(false()) p2: implies#(x,false()) -> not#(x) p3: implies#(not(x),not(y)) -> implies#(y,and(x,y)) p4: implies#(not(x),not(y)) -> and#(x,y) and R consists of: r1: and(x,false()) -> false() r2: and(x,not(false())) -> x r3: not(not(x)) -> x r4: implies(false(),y) -> not(false()) r5: implies(x,false()) -> not(x) r6: implies(not(x),not(y)) -> implies(y,and(x,y)) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p3} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: implies#(not(x),not(y)) -> implies#(y,and(x,y)) and R consists of: r1: and(x,false()) -> false() r2: and(x,not(false())) -> x r3: not(not(x)) -> x r4: implies(false(),y) -> not(false()) r5: implies(x,false()) -> not(x) r6: implies(not(x),not(y)) -> implies(y,and(x,y)) The set of usable rules consists of r1, r2 Take the reduction pair: lexicographic combination of reduction pairs: 1. weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: implies#_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 1, x2 - 3} not_A(x1) = max{6, x1 + 5} and_A(x1,x2) = max{8, x1 + 5} false_A = 4 precedence: not > and = false > implies# partial status: pi(implies#) = [] pi(not) = [1] pi(and) = [1] pi(false) = [] 2. weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: implies#_A(x1,x2) = 0 not_A(x1) = x1 + 2 and_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 3 false_A = 2 precedence: and = false > implies# = not partial status: pi(implies#) = [] pi(not) = [1] pi(and) = [] pi(false) = [] The next rules are strictly ordered: p1 We remove them from the problem. Then no dependency pair remains.