YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  f(f(x,y,z),u,f(x,y,v)) -> f(x,y,f(z,u,v))
  f(x,y,y) -> y
  f(x,y,g(y)) -> x
  f(x,x,y) -> x
  f(g(x),x,y) -> y

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(f(x,y,z),u,f(x,y,v)) -> f#(x,y,f(z,u,v))
p2: f#(f(x,y,z),u,f(x,y,v)) -> f#(z,u,v)

and R consists of:

r1: f(f(x,y,z),u,f(x,y,v)) -> f(x,y,f(z,u,v))
r2: f(x,y,y) -> y
r3: f(x,y,g(y)) -> x
r4: f(x,x,y) -> x
r5: f(g(x),x,y) -> y

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(f(x,y,z),u,f(x,y,v)) -> f#(x,y,f(z,u,v))
p2: f#(f(x,y,z),u,f(x,y,v)) -> f#(z,u,v)

and R consists of:

r1: f(f(x,y,z),u,f(x,y,v)) -> f(x,y,f(z,u,v))
r2: f(x,y,y) -> y
r3: f(x,y,g(y)) -> x
r4: f(x,x,y) -> x
r5: f(g(x),x,y) -> y

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3, r4, r5

Take the reduction pair:

  lexicographic combination of reduction pairs:
  
    1. weighted path order
    
      base order:
    
        max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
        
          f#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{x1 + 2, x2 + 2, x3}
          f_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{x1 + 2, x2 + 2, x3}
          g_A(x1) = max{0, x1 - 1}
    
      precedence:
      
        f# = f = g
      
      partial status:
    
        pi(f#) = [1, 2, 3]
        pi(f) = [1, 2, 3]
        pi(g) = []
    
    2. weighted path order
    
      base order:
    
        max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
        
          f#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{x1 + 1, x2 + 3, x3 - 1}
          f_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{x1 + 6, x2 + 4, x3 + 4}
          g_A(x1) = 0
    
      precedence:
      
        f > f# = g
      
      partial status:
    
        pi(f#) = [1]
        pi(f) = []
        pi(g) = []
    

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1, p2

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.