YES We show the termination of the TRS R: f(a(),f(x,a())) -> f(a(),f(f(a(),x),f(a(),a()))) -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(a(),f(x,a())) -> f#(a(),f(f(a(),x),f(a(),a()))) p2: f#(a(),f(x,a())) -> f#(f(a(),x),f(a(),a())) p3: f#(a(),f(x,a())) -> f#(a(),x) p4: f#(a(),f(x,a())) -> f#(a(),a()) and R consists of: r1: f(a(),f(x,a())) -> f(a(),f(f(a(),x),f(a(),a()))) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1, p2, p3} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(a(),f(x,a())) -> f#(a(),f(f(a(),x),f(a(),a()))) p2: f#(a(),f(x,a())) -> f#(a(),x) p3: f#(a(),f(x,a())) -> f#(f(a(),x),f(a(),a())) and R consists of: r1: f(a(),f(x,a())) -> f(a(),f(f(a(),x),f(a(),a()))) The set of usable rules consists of r1 Take the reduction pair: lexicographic combination of reduction pairs: 1. weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: f#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 10 a_A = 4 f_A(x1,x2) = 3 precedence: f# = a > f partial status: pi(f#) = [1] pi(a) = [] pi(f) = [] 2. weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: f#_A(x1,x2) = max{24, x1 + 17} a_A = 13 f_A(x1,x2) = 0 precedence: f# = a = f partial status: pi(f#) = [] pi(a) = [] pi(f) = [] The next rules are strictly ordered: p3 We remove them from the problem. -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(a(),f(x,a())) -> f#(a(),f(f(a(),x),f(a(),a()))) p2: f#(a(),f(x,a())) -> f#(a(),x) and R consists of: r1: f(a(),f(x,a())) -> f(a(),f(f(a(),x),f(a(),a()))) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1, p2} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(a(),f(x,a())) -> f#(a(),f(f(a(),x),f(a(),a()))) p2: f#(a(),f(x,a())) -> f#(a(),x) and R consists of: r1: f(a(),f(x,a())) -> f(a(),f(f(a(),x),f(a(),a()))) The set of usable rules consists of r1 Take the reduction pair: lexicographic combination of reduction pairs: 1. weighted path order base order: matrix interpretations: carrier: N^2 order: standard order interpretations: f#_A(x1,x2) = ((1,0),(0,0)) x1 + ((1,0),(0,0)) x2 a_A() = (0,1) f_A(x1,x2) = ((1,0),(0,0)) x1 + x2 precedence: f# = a = f partial status: pi(f#) = [] pi(a) = [] pi(f) = [] 2. weighted path order base order: matrix interpretations: carrier: N^2 order: standard order interpretations: f#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + ((1,0),(0,0)) x2 + (1,1) a_A() = (0,2) f_A(x1,x2) = ((1,1),(0,0)) x1 + ((0,1),(0,0)) x2 precedence: f# = a = f partial status: pi(f#) = [1] pi(a) = [] pi(f) = [] The next rules are strictly ordered: p2 We remove them from the problem. -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(a(),f(x,a())) -> f#(a(),f(f(a(),x),f(a(),a()))) and R consists of: r1: f(a(),f(x,a())) -> f(a(),f(f(a(),x),f(a(),a()))) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(a(),f(x,a())) -> f#(a(),f(f(a(),x),f(a(),a()))) and R consists of: r1: f(a(),f(x,a())) -> f(a(),f(f(a(),x),f(a(),a()))) The set of usable rules consists of r1 Take the reduction pair: lexicographic combination of reduction pairs: 1. weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: f#_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 14, x2 + 25} a_A = 17 f_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x2 - 6} precedence: f# = a = f partial status: pi(f#) = [2] pi(a) = [] pi(f) = [] 2. weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: f#_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 23 a_A = 30 f_A(x1,x2) = 17 precedence: f# = a = f partial status: pi(f#) = [] pi(a) = [] pi(f) = [] The next rules are strictly ordered: p1 We remove them from the problem. Then no dependency pair remains.