YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  minus(x,|0|()) -> x
  minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
  f(|0|()) -> s(|0|())
  f(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),g(f(x)))
  g(|0|()) -> |0|()
  g(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),f(g(x)))

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: minus#(s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(x,y)
p2: f#(s(x)) -> minus#(s(x),g(f(x)))
p3: f#(s(x)) -> g#(f(x))
p4: f#(s(x)) -> f#(x)
p5: g#(s(x)) -> minus#(s(x),f(g(x)))
p6: g#(s(x)) -> f#(g(x))
p7: g#(s(x)) -> g#(x)

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: f(|0|()) -> s(|0|())
r4: f(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),g(f(x)))
r5: g(|0|()) -> |0|()
r6: g(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),f(g(x)))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p3, p4, p6, p7}
  {p1}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: g#(s(x)) -> g#(x)
p2: g#(s(x)) -> f#(g(x))
p3: f#(s(x)) -> f#(x)
p4: f#(s(x)) -> g#(f(x))

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: f(|0|()) -> s(|0|())
r4: f(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),g(f(x)))
r5: g(|0|()) -> |0|()
r6: g(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),f(g(x)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
      
        g#_A(x1) = x1 + 18
        s_A(x1) = max{21, x1 + 17}
        f#_A(x1) = x1 + 28
        g_A(x1) = max{6, x1 + 3}
        f_A(x1) = max{26, x1 + 19}
        minus_A(x1,x2) = max{18, x1 + 3, x2 - 2}
        |0|_A = 20
  
    precedence:
    
      g# = s = f# = g = f = minus = |0|
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(g#) = []
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(f#) = [1]
      pi(g) = [1]
      pi(f) = []
      pi(minus) = []
      pi(|0|) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p3

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: g#(s(x)) -> g#(x)
p2: g#(s(x)) -> f#(g(x))
p3: f#(s(x)) -> g#(f(x))

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: f(|0|()) -> s(|0|())
r4: f(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),g(f(x)))
r5: g(|0|()) -> |0|()
r6: g(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),f(g(x)))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2, p3}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: g#(s(x)) -> g#(x)
p2: g#(s(x)) -> f#(g(x))
p3: f#(s(x)) -> g#(f(x))

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: f(|0|()) -> s(|0|())
r4: f(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),g(f(x)))
r5: g(|0|()) -> |0|()
r6: g(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),f(g(x)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
      
        g#_A(x1) = max{20, x1 + 10}
        s_A(x1) = max{33, x1 + 18}
        f#_A(x1) = max{19, x1 + 13}
        g_A(x1) = max{27, x1 + 14}
        f_A(x1) = max{36, x1 + 21}
        minus_A(x1,x2) = max{37, x1 + 2, x2 - 10}
        |0|_A = 17
  
    precedence:
    
      g# = s = f# = g = f = minus = |0|
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(g#) = []
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(f#) = [1]
      pi(g) = []
      pi(f) = []
      pi(minus) = [1]
      pi(|0|) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p3

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: g#(s(x)) -> g#(x)
p2: g#(s(x)) -> f#(g(x))

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: f(|0|()) -> s(|0|())
r4: f(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),g(f(x)))
r5: g(|0|()) -> |0|()
r6: g(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),f(g(x)))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: g#(s(x)) -> g#(x)

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: f(|0|()) -> s(|0|())
r4: f(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),g(f(x)))
r5: g(|0|()) -> |0|()
r6: g(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),f(g(x)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the monotone reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
      
        g#_A(x1) = x1 + 2
        s_A(x1) = x1 + 2
  
    precedence:
    
      g# = s
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(g#) = [1]
      pi(s) = [1]

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: minus#(s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: f(|0|()) -> s(|0|())
r4: f(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),g(f(x)))
r5: g(|0|()) -> |0|()
r6: g(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),f(g(x)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
      
        minus#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 2, x2 - 2}
        s_A(x1) = max{3, x1 + 1}
  
    precedence:
    
      minus# = s
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(minus#) = []
      pi(s) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.