YES We show the termination of the TRS R: +(x,+(y,z)) -> +(+(x,y),z) +(*(x,y),+(x,z)) -> *(x,+(y,z)) +(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u)) -> +(*(x,+(y,z)),u) -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: +#(x,+(y,z)) -> +#(+(x,y),z) p2: +#(x,+(y,z)) -> +#(x,y) p3: +#(*(x,y),+(x,z)) -> +#(y,z) p4: +#(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u)) -> +#(*(x,+(y,z)),u) p5: +#(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u)) -> +#(y,z) and R consists of: r1: +(x,+(y,z)) -> +(+(x,y),z) r2: +(*(x,y),+(x,z)) -> *(x,+(y,z)) r3: +(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u)) -> +(*(x,+(y,z)),u) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1, p2, p3, p4, p5} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: +#(x,+(y,z)) -> +#(+(x,y),z) p2: +#(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u)) -> +#(y,z) p3: +#(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u)) -> +#(*(x,+(y,z)),u) p4: +#(*(x,y),+(x,z)) -> +#(y,z) p5: +#(x,+(y,z)) -> +#(x,y) and R consists of: r1: +(x,+(y,z)) -> +(+(x,y),z) r2: +(*(x,y),+(x,z)) -> *(x,+(y,z)) r3: +(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u)) -> +(*(x,+(y,z)),u) The set of usable rules consists of r1, r2, r3 Take the reduction pair: weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: +#_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 1, x2 + 8} +_A(x1,x2) = max{x1, x2 + 6} *_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 6, x2 + 1} precedence: +# = + = * partial status: pi(+#) = [] pi(+) = [] pi(*) = [] The next rules are strictly ordered: p4 We remove them from the problem. -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: +#(x,+(y,z)) -> +#(+(x,y),z) p2: +#(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u)) -> +#(y,z) p3: +#(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u)) -> +#(*(x,+(y,z)),u) p4: +#(x,+(y,z)) -> +#(x,y) and R consists of: r1: +(x,+(y,z)) -> +(+(x,y),z) r2: +(*(x,y),+(x,z)) -> *(x,+(y,z)) r3: +(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u)) -> +(*(x,+(y,z)),u) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1, p2, p3, p4} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: +#(x,+(y,z)) -> +#(+(x,y),z) p2: +#(x,+(y,z)) -> +#(x,y) p3: +#(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u)) -> +#(*(x,+(y,z)),u) p4: +#(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u)) -> +#(y,z) and R consists of: r1: +(x,+(y,z)) -> +(+(x,y),z) r2: +(*(x,y),+(x,z)) -> *(x,+(y,z)) r3: +(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u)) -> +(*(x,+(y,z)),u) The set of usable rules consists of r1, r2, r3 Take the reduction pair: weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: +#_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 3 +_A(x1,x2) = max{x1, x2 + 6} *_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 6, x2 + 2} precedence: + > * > +# partial status: pi(+#) = [] pi(+) = [] pi(*) = [] The next rules are strictly ordered: p4 We remove them from the problem. -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: +#(x,+(y,z)) -> +#(+(x,y),z) p2: +#(x,+(y,z)) -> +#(x,y) p3: +#(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u)) -> +#(*(x,+(y,z)),u) and R consists of: r1: +(x,+(y,z)) -> +(+(x,y),z) r2: +(*(x,y),+(x,z)) -> *(x,+(y,z)) r3: +(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u)) -> +(*(x,+(y,z)),u) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1, p2, p3} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: +#(x,+(y,z)) -> +#(+(x,y),z) p2: +#(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u)) -> +#(*(x,+(y,z)),u) p3: +#(x,+(y,z)) -> +#(x,y) and R consists of: r1: +(x,+(y,z)) -> +(+(x,y),z) r2: +(*(x,y),+(x,z)) -> *(x,+(y,z)) r3: +(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u)) -> +(*(x,+(y,z)),u) The set of usable rules consists of r1, r2, r3 Take the reduction pair: weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: +#_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 10 +_A(x1,x2) = max{x1, x2 + 10} *_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 8, x2 - 2} precedence: +# = + = * partial status: pi(+#) = [] pi(+) = [] pi(*) = [] The next rules are strictly ordered: p2 We remove them from the problem. -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: +#(x,+(y,z)) -> +#(+(x,y),z) p2: +#(x,+(y,z)) -> +#(x,y) and R consists of: r1: +(x,+(y,z)) -> +(+(x,y),z) r2: +(*(x,y),+(x,z)) -> *(x,+(y,z)) r3: +(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u)) -> +(*(x,+(y,z)),u) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1, p2} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: +#(x,+(y,z)) -> +#(+(x,y),z) p2: +#(x,+(y,z)) -> +#(x,y) and R consists of: r1: +(x,+(y,z)) -> +(+(x,y),z) r2: +(*(x,y),+(x,z)) -> *(x,+(y,z)) r3: +(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u)) -> +(*(x,+(y,z)),u) The set of usable rules consists of r1, r2, r3 Take the reduction pair: weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: +#_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 4 +_A(x1,x2) = max{x1, x2 + 3} *_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 3, x2 + 2} precedence: +# = + = * partial status: pi(+#) = [] pi(+) = [2] pi(*) = [] The next rules are strictly ordered: p1 We remove them from the problem. -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: +#(x,+(y,z)) -> +#(x,y) and R consists of: r1: +(x,+(y,z)) -> +(+(x,y),z) r2: +(*(x,y),+(x,z)) -> *(x,+(y,z)) r3: +(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u)) -> +(*(x,+(y,z)),u) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: +#(x,+(y,z)) -> +#(x,y) and R consists of: r1: +(x,+(y,z)) -> +(+(x,y),z) r2: +(*(x,y),+(x,z)) -> *(x,+(y,z)) r3: +(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u)) -> +(*(x,+(y,z)),u) The set of usable rules consists of (no rules) Take the reduction pair: weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: +#_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 1, x2 + 1} +_A(x1,x2) = max{x1, x2} precedence: +# = + partial status: pi(+#) = [2] pi(+) = [1, 2] The next rules are strictly ordered: p1 We remove them from the problem. Then no dependency pair remains.