YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  del(.(x,.(y,z))) -> f(=(x,y),x,y,z)
  f(true(),x,y,z) -> del(.(y,z))
  f(false(),x,y,z) -> .(x,del(.(y,z)))
  =(nil(),nil()) -> true()
  =(.(x,y),nil()) -> false()
  =(nil(),.(y,z)) -> false()
  =(.(x,y),.(u(),v())) -> and(=(x,u()),=(y,v()))

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: del#(.(x,.(y,z))) -> f#(=(x,y),x,y,z)
p2: del#(.(x,.(y,z))) -> =#(x,y)
p3: f#(true(),x,y,z) -> del#(.(y,z))
p4: f#(false(),x,y,z) -> del#(.(y,z))
p5: =#(.(x,y),.(u(),v())) -> =#(x,u())
p6: =#(.(x,y),.(u(),v())) -> =#(y,v())

and R consists of:

r1: del(.(x,.(y,z))) -> f(=(x,y),x,y,z)
r2: f(true(),x,y,z) -> del(.(y,z))
r3: f(false(),x,y,z) -> .(x,del(.(y,z)))
r4: =(nil(),nil()) -> true()
r5: =(.(x,y),nil()) -> false()
r6: =(nil(),.(y,z)) -> false()
r7: =(.(x,y),.(u(),v())) -> and(=(x,u()),=(y,v()))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p3, p4}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: del#(.(x,.(y,z))) -> f#(=(x,y),x,y,z)
p2: f#(false(),x,y,z) -> del#(.(y,z))
p3: f#(true(),x,y,z) -> del#(.(y,z))

and R consists of:

r1: del(.(x,.(y,z))) -> f(=(x,y),x,y,z)
r2: f(true(),x,y,z) -> del(.(y,z))
r3: f(false(),x,y,z) -> .(x,del(.(y,z)))
r4: =(nil(),nil()) -> true()
r5: =(.(x,y),nil()) -> false()
r6: =(nil(),.(y,z)) -> false()
r7: =(.(x,y),.(u(),v())) -> and(=(x,u()),=(y,v()))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r4, r5, r6, r7

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
      
        del#_A(x1) = max{27, x1 + 18}
        ._A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 11, x2 + 4}
        f#_A(x1,x2,x3,x4) = max{x1 - 1, x2 + 28, x3 + 33, x4 + 26}
        =_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 30, x2 + 28}
        false_A = 3
        true_A = 29
        nil_A = 2
        u_A = 1
        v_A = 3
        and_A(x1,x2) = max{27, x1 + 7, x2 - 4}
  
    precedence:
    
      del# = . = f# = = = false = true = nil = u = v = and
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(del#) = [1]
      pi(.) = [2]
      pi(f#) = [3, 4]
      pi(=) = []
      pi(false) = []
      pi(true) = []
      pi(nil) = []
      pi(u) = []
      pi(v) = []
      pi(and) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(false(),x,y,z) -> del#(.(y,z))
p2: f#(true(),x,y,z) -> del#(.(y,z))

and R consists of:

r1: del(.(x,.(y,z))) -> f(=(x,y),x,y,z)
r2: f(true(),x,y,z) -> del(.(y,z))
r3: f(false(),x,y,z) -> .(x,del(.(y,z)))
r4: =(nil(),nil()) -> true()
r5: =(.(x,y),nil()) -> false()
r6: =(nil(),.(y,z)) -> false()
r7: =(.(x,y),.(u(),v())) -> and(=(x,u()),=(y,v()))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  (no SCCs)