YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  admit(x,nil()) -> nil()
  admit(x,.(u,.(v,.(w(),z)))) -> cond(=(sum(x,u,v),w()),.(u,.(v,.(w(),admit(carry(x,u,v),z)))))
  cond(true(),y) -> y

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: admit#(x,.(u,.(v,.(w(),z)))) -> cond#(=(sum(x,u,v),w()),.(u,.(v,.(w(),admit(carry(x,u,v),z)))))
p2: admit#(x,.(u,.(v,.(w(),z)))) -> admit#(carry(x,u,v),z)

and R consists of:

r1: admit(x,nil()) -> nil()
r2: admit(x,.(u,.(v,.(w(),z)))) -> cond(=(sum(x,u,v),w()),.(u,.(v,.(w(),admit(carry(x,u,v),z)))))
r3: cond(true(),y) -> y

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: admit#(x,.(u,.(v,.(w(),z)))) -> admit#(carry(x,u,v),z)

and R consists of:

r1: admit(x,nil()) -> nil()
r2: admit(x,.(u,.(v,.(w(),z)))) -> cond(=(sum(x,u,v),w()),.(u,.(v,.(w(),admit(carry(x,u,v),z)))))
r3: cond(true(),y) -> y

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
      
        admit#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 9, x2 - 4}
        ._A(x1,x2) = max{5, x1, x2 + 1}
        w_A = 3
        carry_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{4, x1 - 8, x2 - 1, x3 - 1}
  
    precedence:
    
      admit# = . = w = carry
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(admit#) = []
      pi(.) = [1, 2]
      pi(w) = []
      pi(carry) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.