YES We show the termination of the TRS R: *(x,*(minus(y),y)) -> *(minus(*(y,y)),x) -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: *#(x,*(minus(y),y)) -> *#(minus(*(y,y)),x) p2: *#(x,*(minus(y),y)) -> *#(y,y) and R consists of: r1: *(x,*(minus(y),y)) -> *(minus(*(y,y)),x) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1, p2} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: *#(x,*(minus(y),y)) -> *#(minus(*(y,y)),x) p2: *#(x,*(minus(y),y)) -> *#(y,y) and R consists of: r1: *(x,*(minus(y),y)) -> *(minus(*(y,y)),x) The set of usable rules consists of r1 Take the reduction pair: weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: *#_A(x1,x2) = max{9, x1 - 3, x2 - 3} *_A(x1,x2) = max{13, x1 + 7, x2 + 7} minus_A(x1) = max{8, x1} precedence: *# = * = minus partial status: pi(*#) = [] pi(*) = [] pi(minus) = [1] The next rules are strictly ordered: p2 We remove them from the problem. -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: *#(x,*(minus(y),y)) -> *#(minus(*(y,y)),x) and R consists of: r1: *(x,*(minus(y),y)) -> *(minus(*(y,y)),x) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: *#(x,*(minus(y),y)) -> *#(minus(*(y,y)),x) and R consists of: r1: *(x,*(minus(y),y)) -> *(minus(*(y,y)),x) The set of usable rules consists of r1 Take the reduction pair: weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: *#_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 4, x2 + 1} *_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 6, x2 + 6} minus_A(x1) = 1 precedence: * > *# > minus partial status: pi(*#) = [] pi(*) = [] pi(minus) = [] The next rules are strictly ordered: p1 We remove them from the problem. Then no dependency pair remains.