YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
  active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
  active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
  mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
  mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
  mark(c()) -> active(c())
  mark(true()) -> active(true())
  mark(false()) -> active(false())
  f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
  f(active(X)) -> f(X)
  if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
  if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
  if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
  if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
  if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
  if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: active#(f(X)) -> mark#(if(X,c(),f(true())))
p2: active#(f(X)) -> if#(X,c(),f(true()))
p3: active#(f(X)) -> f#(true())
p4: active#(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark#(X)
p5: active#(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark#(Y)
p6: mark#(f(X)) -> active#(f(mark(X)))
p7: mark#(f(X)) -> f#(mark(X))
p8: mark#(f(X)) -> mark#(X)
p9: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active#(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
p10: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> if#(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3)
p11: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> mark#(X1)
p12: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> mark#(X2)
p13: mark#(c()) -> active#(c())
p14: mark#(true()) -> active#(true())
p15: mark#(false()) -> active#(false())
p16: f#(mark(X)) -> f#(X)
p17: f#(active(X)) -> f#(X)
p18: if#(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p19: if#(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p20: if#(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p21: if#(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p22: if#(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p23: if#(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p4, p5, p6, p8, p9, p11, p12}
  {p18, p19, p20, p21, p22, p23}
  {p16, p17}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: active#(f(X)) -> mark#(if(X,c(),f(true())))
p2: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> mark#(X2)
p3: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> mark#(X1)
p4: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active#(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
p5: active#(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark#(Y)
p6: mark#(f(X)) -> mark#(X)
p7: mark#(f(X)) -> active#(f(mark(X)))
p8: active#(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark#(X)

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, r10, r11, r12, r13, r14, r15, r16

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
      
        active#_A(x1) = max{14, x1 - 3}
        f_A(x1) = max{29, x1 + 21}
        mark#_A(x1) = max{0, x1 - 3}
        if_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{17, x1 + 10, x2 + 5, x3}
        c_A = 24
        true_A = 8
        mark_A(x1) = max{6, x1}
        false_A = 8
        active_A(x1) = max{7, x1}
  
    precedence:
    
      active# = f = mark# = if = c = true = mark = false = active
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(active#) = []
      pi(f) = []
      pi(mark#) = []
      pi(if) = []
      pi(c) = []
      pi(true) = []
      pi(mark) = []
      pi(false) = []
      pi(active) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p6

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: active#(f(X)) -> mark#(if(X,c(),f(true())))
p2: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> mark#(X2)
p3: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> mark#(X1)
p4: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active#(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
p5: active#(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark#(Y)
p6: mark#(f(X)) -> active#(f(mark(X)))
p7: active#(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark#(X)

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: active#(f(X)) -> mark#(if(X,c(),f(true())))
p2: mark#(f(X)) -> active#(f(mark(X)))
p3: active#(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark#(X)
p4: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active#(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
p5: active#(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark#(Y)
p6: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> mark#(X1)
p7: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> mark#(X2)

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, r10, r11, r12, r13, r14, r15, r16

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
      
        active#_A(x1) = max{0, x1 - 2}
        f_A(x1) = x1
        mark#_A(x1) = max{0, x1 - 2}
        if_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{x1, x2, x3 + 1}
        c_A = 0
        true_A = 0
        mark_A(x1) = max{1, x1}
        false_A = 3
        active_A(x1) = max{1, x1}
  
    precedence:
    
      false > if > active# = f = mark# = c = true > mark = active
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(active#) = []
      pi(f) = []
      pi(mark#) = []
      pi(if) = []
      pi(c) = []
      pi(true) = []
      pi(mark) = []
      pi(false) = []
      pi(active) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p5

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: active#(f(X)) -> mark#(if(X,c(),f(true())))
p2: mark#(f(X)) -> active#(f(mark(X)))
p3: active#(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark#(X)
p4: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active#(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
p5: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> mark#(X1)
p6: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> mark#(X2)

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: active#(f(X)) -> mark#(if(X,c(),f(true())))
p2: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> mark#(X2)
p3: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> mark#(X1)
p4: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active#(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
p5: active#(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark#(X)
p6: mark#(f(X)) -> active#(f(mark(X)))

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, r10, r11, r12, r13, r14, r15, r16

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
      
        active#_A(x1) = max{12, x1 + 5}
        f_A(x1) = max{24, x1 + 17}
        mark#_A(x1) = max{16, x1 + 5}
        if_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{11, x1 + 10, x2 + 8, x3}
        c_A = 13
        true_A = 7
        mark_A(x1) = max{1, x1}
        active_A(x1) = max{7, x1}
        false_A = 8
  
    precedence:
    
      active# = f = mark# = if = c = true = mark = active = false
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(active#) = [1]
      pi(f) = []
      pi(mark#) = [1]
      pi(if) = []
      pi(c) = []
      pi(true) = []
      pi(mark) = []
      pi(active) = []
      pi(false) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p5

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: active#(f(X)) -> mark#(if(X,c(),f(true())))
p2: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> mark#(X2)
p3: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> mark#(X1)
p4: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active#(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
p5: mark#(f(X)) -> active#(f(mark(X)))

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2, p3, p4, p5}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: active#(f(X)) -> mark#(if(X,c(),f(true())))
p2: mark#(f(X)) -> active#(f(mark(X)))
p3: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active#(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
p4: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> mark#(X1)
p5: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> mark#(X2)

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, r10, r11, r12, r13, r14, r15, r16

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
      
        active#_A(x1) = max{25, x1 - 34}
        f_A(x1) = max{47, x1 + 43}
        mark#_A(x1) = max{0, x1 - 22}
        if_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{47, x1 + 30, x2 + 26, x3}
        c_A = 4
        true_A = 2
        mark_A(x1) = max{3, x1}
        active_A(x1) = max{1, x1}
        false_A = 4
  
    precedence:
    
      c = true > f = mark = active = false > if > active# = mark#
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(active#) = []
      pi(f) = []
      pi(mark#) = []
      pi(if) = []
      pi(c) = []
      pi(true) = []
      pi(mark) = []
      pi(active) = []
      pi(false) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p5

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: active#(f(X)) -> mark#(if(X,c(),f(true())))
p2: mark#(f(X)) -> active#(f(mark(X)))
p3: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active#(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
p4: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> mark#(X1)

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2, p3, p4}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: active#(f(X)) -> mark#(if(X,c(),f(true())))
p2: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> mark#(X1)
p3: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active#(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
p4: mark#(f(X)) -> active#(f(mark(X)))

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, r10, r11, r12, r13, r14, r15, r16

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
      
        active#_A(x1) = max{7, x1 - 1}
        f_A(x1) = 23
        mark#_A(x1) = 22
        if_A(x1,x2,x3) = 22
        c_A = 8
        true_A = 9
        mark_A(x1) = 51
        active_A(x1) = max{51, x1 + 28}
        false_A = 9
  
    precedence:
    
      active# = f = mark# = if = c = true = mark = active = false
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(active#) = []
      pi(f) = []
      pi(mark#) = []
      pi(if) = []
      pi(c) = []
      pi(true) = []
      pi(mark) = []
      pi(active) = []
      pi(false) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p3

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: active#(f(X)) -> mark#(if(X,c(),f(true())))
p2: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> mark#(X1)
p3: mark#(f(X)) -> active#(f(mark(X)))

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2, p3}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: active#(f(X)) -> mark#(if(X,c(),f(true())))
p2: mark#(f(X)) -> active#(f(mark(X)))
p3: mark#(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> mark#(X1)

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, r10, r11, r12, r13, r14, r15, r16

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
      
        active#_A(x1) = max{29, x1 + 2}
        f_A(x1) = max{21, x1 + 17}
        mark#_A(x1) = max{29, x1 + 7}
        if_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{11, x1 + 8, x2 + 8, x3}
        c_A = 10
        true_A = 3
        mark_A(x1) = x1
        active_A(x1) = max{3, x1}
        false_A = 3
  
    precedence:
    
      active# = f = mark# = if = c = true = mark = active = false
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(active#) = [1]
      pi(f) = []
      pi(mark#) = [1]
      pi(if) = []
      pi(c) = []
      pi(true) = []
      pi(mark) = []
      pi(active) = []
      pi(false) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p3

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: active#(f(X)) -> mark#(if(X,c(),f(true())))
p2: mark#(f(X)) -> active#(f(mark(X)))

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: active#(f(X)) -> mark#(if(X,c(),f(true())))
p2: mark#(f(X)) -> active#(f(mark(X)))

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, r10, r11, r12, r13, r14, r15, r16

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
      
        active#_A(x1) = max{3, x1}
        f_A(x1) = x1 + 5
        mark#_A(x1) = max{4, x1}
        if_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{x2 + 1, x3}
        c_A = 1
        true_A = 0
        mark_A(x1) = x1
        active_A(x1) = x1
        false_A = 1
  
    precedence:
    
      f = c = true = mark = active > active# = mark# = if = false
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(active#) = [1]
      pi(f) = []
      pi(mark#) = [1]
      pi(if) = []
      pi(c) = []
      pi(true) = []
      pi(mark) = []
      pi(active) = []
      pi(false) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: mark#(f(X)) -> active#(f(mark(X)))

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  (no SCCs)

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: if#(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p2: if#(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p3: if#(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p4: if#(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p5: if#(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p6: if#(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
      
        if#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{x1 - 1, x2 - 1, x3 + 1}
        mark_A(x1) = x1
        active_A(x1) = x1
  
    precedence:
    
      if# = mark = active
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(if#) = [3]
      pi(mark) = [1]
      pi(active) = [1]

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p2

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: if#(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p2: if#(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p3: if#(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p4: if#(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p5: if#(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2, p3, p4, p5}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: if#(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p2: if#(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p3: if#(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p4: if#(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p5: if#(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
      
        if#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{0, x2 - 2}
        mark_A(x1) = max{3, x1 + 1}
        active_A(x1) = x1
  
    precedence:
    
      if# = mark = active
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(if#) = []
      pi(mark) = [1]
      pi(active) = [1]

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p2

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: if#(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p2: if#(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p3: if#(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p4: if#(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2, p3, p4}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: if#(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p2: if#(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p3: if#(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p4: if#(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
      
        if#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{x1 - 1, x2 - 1, x3 + 1}
        mark_A(x1) = x1
        active_A(x1) = x1
  
    precedence:
    
      if# = mark = active
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(if#) = [3]
      pi(mark) = [1]
      pi(active) = [1]

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p4

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: if#(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p2: if#(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p3: if#(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2, p3}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: if#(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p2: if#(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p3: if#(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
      
        if#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{x1 - 1, x2 + 1, x3 + 1}
        mark_A(x1) = x1
        active_A(x1) = x1
  
    precedence:
    
      if# = mark = active
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(if#) = [2]
      pi(mark) = [1]
      pi(active) = [1]

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p3

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: if#(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p2: if#(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: if#(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)
p2: if#(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
      
        if#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{x1, x3 + 1}
        mark_A(x1) = x1 + 2
        active_A(x1) = x1 + 1
  
    precedence:
    
      if# = mark = active
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(if#) = [1]
      pi(mark) = []
      pi(active) = [1]

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: if#(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: if#(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if#(X1,X2,X3)

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
      
        if#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{x1 + 1, x2 + 1, x3 + 1}
        active_A(x1) = x1
  
    precedence:
    
      if# = active
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(if#) = [1]
      pi(active) = [1]

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(mark(X)) -> f#(X)
p2: f#(active(X)) -> f#(X)

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the monotone reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
      
        f#_A(x1) = x1 + 1
        mark_A(x1) = x1
        active_A(x1) = x1
  
    precedence:
    
      f# = mark = active
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(f#) = [1]
      pi(mark) = [1]
      pi(active) = [1]

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(active(X)) -> f#(X)

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(active(X)) -> f#(X)

and R consists of:

r1: active(f(X)) -> mark(if(X,c(),f(true())))
r2: active(if(true(),X,Y)) -> mark(X)
r3: active(if(false(),X,Y)) -> mark(Y)
r4: mark(f(X)) -> active(f(mark(X)))
r5: mark(if(X1,X2,X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1),mark(X2),X3))
r6: mark(c()) -> active(c())
r7: mark(true()) -> active(true())
r8: mark(false()) -> active(false())
r9: f(mark(X)) -> f(X)
r10: f(active(X)) -> f(X)
r11: if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r12: if(X1,mark(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r13: if(X1,X2,mark(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r14: if(active(X1),X2,X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r15: if(X1,active(X2),X3) -> if(X1,X2,X3)
r16: if(X1,X2,active(X3)) -> if(X1,X2,X3)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the monotone reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
      
        f#_A(x1) = x1 + 1
        active_A(x1) = x1
  
    precedence:
    
      f# = active
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(f#) = [1]
      pi(active) = [1]

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.