YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) -> *(x,+(y,z))
  +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
  +(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u())) -> +(*(x,+(y,z)),u())

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: +#(*(x,y),*(x,z)) -> +#(y,z)
p2: +#(+(x,y),z) -> +#(x,+(y,z))
p3: +#(+(x,y),z) -> +#(y,z)
p4: +#(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u())) -> +#(*(x,+(y,z)),u())
p5: +#(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u())) -> +#(y,z)

and R consists of:

r1: +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) -> *(x,+(y,z))
r2: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r3: +(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u())) -> +(*(x,+(y,z)),u())

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2, p3, p5}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: +#(*(x,y),*(x,z)) -> +#(y,z)
p2: +#(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u())) -> +#(y,z)
p3: +#(+(x,y),z) -> +#(y,z)
p4: +#(+(x,y),z) -> +#(x,+(y,z))

and R consists of:

r1: +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) -> *(x,+(y,z))
r2: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r3: +(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u())) -> +(*(x,+(y,z)),u())

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
      
        +#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 1
        *_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 4, x2 + 1}
        +_A(x1,x2) = max{x1, x2}
        u_A = 1
  
    precedence:
    
      + = u > +# > *
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(+#) = []
      pi(*) = [2]
      pi(+) = []
      pi(u) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: +#(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u())) -> +#(y,z)
p2: +#(+(x,y),z) -> +#(y,z)
p3: +#(+(x,y),z) -> +#(x,+(y,z))

and R consists of:

r1: +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) -> *(x,+(y,z))
r2: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r3: +(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u())) -> +(*(x,+(y,z)),u())

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2, p3}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: +#(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u())) -> +#(y,z)
p2: +#(+(x,y),z) -> +#(x,+(y,z))
p3: +#(+(x,y),z) -> +#(y,z)

and R consists of:

r1: +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) -> *(x,+(y,z))
r2: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r3: +(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u())) -> +(*(x,+(y,z)),u())

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
      
        +#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 4
        *_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 8, x2 + 5}
        +_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1, x2}
        u_A = 4
  
    precedence:
    
      +# = * = + = u
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(+#) = []
      pi(*) = []
      pi(+) = []
      pi(u) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: +#(+(x,y),z) -> +#(x,+(y,z))
p2: +#(+(x,y),z) -> +#(y,z)

and R consists of:

r1: +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) -> *(x,+(y,z))
r2: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r3: +(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u())) -> +(*(x,+(y,z)),u())

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: +#(+(x,y),z) -> +#(x,+(y,z))
p2: +#(+(x,y),z) -> +#(y,z)

and R consists of:

r1: +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) -> *(x,+(y,z))
r2: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r3: +(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u())) -> +(*(x,+(y,z)),u())

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
      
        +#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 5
        +_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 2, x2}
        *_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 3
        u_A = 2
  
    precedence:
    
      +# = + = * = u
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(+#) = []
      pi(+) = []
      pi(*) = [1]
      pi(u) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: +#(+(x,y),z) -> +#(y,z)

and R consists of:

r1: +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) -> *(x,+(y,z))
r2: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r3: +(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u())) -> +(*(x,+(y,z)),u())

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: +#(+(x,y),z) -> +#(y,z)

and R consists of:

r1: +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) -> *(x,+(y,z))
r2: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r3: +(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u())) -> +(*(x,+(y,z)),u())

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      max/plus interpretations on natural numbers:
      
        +#_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 1, x2 + 1}
        +_A(x1,x2) = x2
  
    precedence:
    
      +# = +
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(+#) = [1]
      pi(+) = [2]

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.