YES We show the termination of the TRS R: f(a(),f(a(),x)) -> f(a(),f(f(a(),x),f(a(),a()))) -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(a(),f(a(),x)) -> f#(a(),f(f(a(),x),f(a(),a()))) p2: f#(a(),f(a(),x)) -> f#(f(a(),x),f(a(),a())) p3: f#(a(),f(a(),x)) -> f#(a(),a()) and R consists of: r1: f(a(),f(a(),x)) -> f(a(),f(f(a(),x),f(a(),a()))) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1, p2} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(a(),f(a(),x)) -> f#(a(),f(f(a(),x),f(a(),a()))) p2: f#(a(),f(a(),x)) -> f#(f(a(),x),f(a(),a())) and R consists of: r1: f(a(),f(a(),x)) -> f(a(),f(f(a(),x),f(a(),a()))) The set of usable rules consists of r1 Take the reduction pair: weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: f#_A(x1,x2) = max{10, x1 + 6, x2 + 7} a_A = 6 f_A(x1,x2) = 2 precedence: f# = a = f partial status: pi(f#) = [2] pi(a) = [] pi(f) = [] The next rules are strictly ordered: p2 We remove them from the problem. -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(a(),f(a(),x)) -> f#(a(),f(f(a(),x),f(a(),a()))) and R consists of: r1: f(a(),f(a(),x)) -> f(a(),f(f(a(),x),f(a(),a()))) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(a(),f(a(),x)) -> f#(a(),f(f(a(),x),f(a(),a()))) and R consists of: r1: f(a(),f(a(),x)) -> f(a(),f(f(a(),x),f(a(),a()))) The set of usable rules consists of r1 Take the reduction pair: weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: f#_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 11, x2 + 18} a_A = 9 f_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 4} precedence: f# = a = f partial status: pi(f#) = [2] pi(a) = [] pi(f) = [] The next rules are strictly ordered: p1 We remove them from the problem. Then no dependency pair remains.