YES We show the termination of the TRS R: f(f(a(),x),a()) -> f(f(f(a(),f(a(),a())),x),a()) -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(f(a(),x),a()) -> f#(f(f(a(),f(a(),a())),x),a()) p2: f#(f(a(),x),a()) -> f#(f(a(),f(a(),a())),x) p3: f#(f(a(),x),a()) -> f#(a(),f(a(),a())) p4: f#(f(a(),x),a()) -> f#(a(),a()) and R consists of: r1: f(f(a(),x),a()) -> f(f(f(a(),f(a(),a())),x),a()) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1, p2} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(f(a(),x),a()) -> f#(f(f(a(),f(a(),a())),x),a()) p2: f#(f(a(),x),a()) -> f#(f(a(),f(a(),a())),x) and R consists of: r1: f(f(a(),x),a()) -> f(f(f(a(),f(a(),a())),x),a()) The set of usable rules consists of r1 Take the reduction pair: weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: f#_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x1 - 38} f_A(x1,x2) = max{42, x1 - 5} a_A = 64 precedence: f# = f = a partial status: pi(f#) = [] pi(f) = [] pi(a) = [] The next rules are strictly ordered: p1 We remove them from the problem. -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(f(a(),x),a()) -> f#(f(a(),f(a(),a())),x) and R consists of: r1: f(f(a(),x),a()) -> f(f(f(a(),f(a(),a())),x),a()) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(f(a(),x),a()) -> f#(f(a(),f(a(),a())),x) and R consists of: r1: f(f(a(),x),a()) -> f(f(f(a(),f(a(),a())),x),a()) The set of usable rules consists of (no rules) Take the reduction pair: weighted path order base order: max/plus interpretations on natural numbers: f#_A(x1,x2) = max{4, x1 - 8, x2 - 12} f_A(x1,x2) = max{4, x1 - 13, x2 - 3} a_A = 17 precedence: a > f# = f partial status: pi(f#) = [] pi(f) = [] pi(a) = [] The next rules are strictly ordered: p1 We remove them from the problem. Then no dependency pair remains.