YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  b(b(|0|(),y),x) -> y
  c(c(c(y))) -> c(c(a(a(c(b(|0|(),y)),|0|()),|0|())))
  a(y,|0|()) -> b(y,|0|())

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: c#(c(c(y))) -> c#(c(a(a(c(b(|0|(),y)),|0|()),|0|())))
p2: c#(c(c(y))) -> c#(a(a(c(b(|0|(),y)),|0|()),|0|()))
p3: c#(c(c(y))) -> a#(a(c(b(|0|(),y)),|0|()),|0|())
p4: c#(c(c(y))) -> a#(c(b(|0|(),y)),|0|())
p5: c#(c(c(y))) -> c#(b(|0|(),y))
p6: c#(c(c(y))) -> b#(|0|(),y)
p7: a#(y,|0|()) -> b#(y,|0|())

and R consists of:

r1: b(b(|0|(),y),x) -> y
r2: c(c(c(y))) -> c(c(a(a(c(b(|0|(),y)),|0|()),|0|())))
r3: a(y,|0|()) -> b(y,|0|())

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: c#(c(c(y))) -> c#(c(a(a(c(b(|0|(),y)),|0|()),|0|())))
p2: c#(c(c(y))) -> c#(a(a(c(b(|0|(),y)),|0|()),|0|()))

and R consists of:

r1: b(b(|0|(),y),x) -> y
r2: c(c(c(y))) -> c(c(a(a(c(b(|0|(),y)),|0|()),|0|())))
r3: a(y,|0|()) -> b(y,|0|())

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      matrix interpretations:
      
        carrier: N^2
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          c#_A(x1) = x1 + (1,0)
          c_A(x1) = ((0,1),(0,0)) x1 + (1,16)
          a_A(x1,x2) = ((1,0),(1,0)) x1 + (5,4)
          b_A(x1,x2) = ((1,0),(1,0)) x1 + ((1,1),(0,0)) x2 + (1,2)
          |0|_A() = (2,1)
  
    precedence:
    
      |0| > c > c# = a = b
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(c#) = [1]
      pi(c) = []
      pi(a) = []
      pi(b) = []
      pi(|0|) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: c#(c(c(y))) -> c#(a(a(c(b(|0|(),y)),|0|()),|0|()))

and R consists of:

r1: b(b(|0|(),y),x) -> y
r2: c(c(c(y))) -> c(c(a(a(c(b(|0|(),y)),|0|()),|0|())))
r3: a(y,|0|()) -> b(y,|0|())

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: c#(c(c(y))) -> c#(a(a(c(b(|0|(),y)),|0|()),|0|()))

and R consists of:

r1: b(b(|0|(),y),x) -> y
r2: c(c(c(y))) -> c(c(a(a(c(b(|0|(),y)),|0|()),|0|())))
r3: a(y,|0|()) -> b(y,|0|())

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r3

Take the reduction pair:

  weighted path order
  
    base order:
  
      matrix interpretations:
      
        carrier: N^2
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          c#_A(x1) = ((0,1),(0,0)) x1 + (1,8)
          c_A(x1) = ((0,0),(0,1)) x1 + (17,7)
          a_A(x1,x2) = x1 + (19,2)
          b_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + (2,1)
          |0|_A() = (16,1)
  
    precedence:
    
      a = b > c# = c = |0|
    
    partial status:
  
      pi(c#) = []
      pi(c) = []
      pi(a) = []
      pi(b) = []
      pi(|0|) = []

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.